This Week in Crypto Law
The opinion editorial below was written by Alex Forehand and Michael Handelsman for Kelman.Law.
The final week of May illustrated a defining trend in global crypto regulation: policymakers are increasingly moving beyond rulemaking and into implementation, enforcement, and market design. Across Europe, Asia, and the United States, regulators are no longer debating whether digital assets should be regulated. Instead, they are grappling with how crypto fits into existing financial systems, how much risk should be permitted, and how jurisdictions can remain competitive without sacrificing oversight.
From Europe’s first warnings of enforcement under MiCA to the launch of regulated perpetual futures in the United States, this week’s developments highlight the rapid maturation of crypto law worldwide.
Europe Signals the Enforcement Phase of MiCA Has Arrived
France’s financial regulator has warned that crypto firms operating within the European Union may face prosecution if they fail to obtain authorization under the bloc’s new crypto licensing framework. The warning comes as the EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation transitions from a legislative framework into an active compliance regime. For years, crypto companies monitored MiCA’s development from a distance. That period is ending. Regulators are making clear that firms serving European customers without appropriate authorization may face real legal consequences. Europe is entering the enforcement stage of crypto regulation. Licensing requirements that once appeared theoretical are becoming operational, creating immediate compliance obligations for exchanges, custodians, and other digital asset service providers.
Coinbase and Kalshi Launch Regulated Perpetual Futures
Coinbase and Kalshi are bringing regulated perpetual crypto futures to U.S. investors. Perpetual futures have historically been among crypto’s most popular trading products, but most activity has occurred through offshore venues operating outside direct U.S. oversight. The introduction of regulated perpetual futures could fundamentally alter that dynamic by bringing high-volume derivatives trading within the domestic regulatory framework. One of crypto’s largest markets is moving out of legal gray zones and into regulated U.S. financial infrastructure. The development reflects a broader effort to bring digital asset activity onshore under established regulatory supervision.
Japan Pushes for Crypto ETFs and Yen Stablecoins
Lawmakers in Japan are encouraging the government to establish a legal framework for crypto exchange-traded funds and promote yen-backed stablecoins throughout Asia. Rather than focusing solely on risk management, Japanese policymakers are increasingly viewing crypto regulation as an economic competitiveness issue. The proposal reflects growing concern that jurisdictions offering clearer legal frameworks may attract investment, talent, and financial infrastructure away from slower-moving markets. Crypto regulation is increasingly being used as an economic development tool. Countries are now competing not only on compliance standards but also on their ability to attract digital asset businesses.
UK Lawmakers Push Back on Stablecoin Restrictions
Members of Parliament in the United Kingdom are urging the Bank of England to reconsider proposed stablecoin regulations that some believe could inhibit innovation. Critics argue that excessive restrictions could place Britain at a disadvantage compared to competing financial centers seeking to attract digital asset businesses. The debate mirrors broader discussions taking place across multiple jurisdictions regarding the appropriate balance between innovation and financial stability. Stablecoins have become one of the most contested areas of crypto regulation. Policymakers increasingly recognize that regulatory choices may influence where future financial infrastructure is built.
Treasury Targets Iranian Crypto Exchanges
The U.S. Department of the Treasury announced sanctions against several Iranian crypto exchanges, alleging they facilitated illicit financial activity and sanctions evasion. The action reflects a broader trend of integrating digital assets into existing sanctions and anti-money laundering enforcement frameworks. Crypto platforms are increasingly viewed as potential nodes within global financial networks, making them relevant not only to securities regulators but also to national security agencies. Crypto enforcement is expanding beyond investor protection and market integrity. National security, sanctions compliance, and geopolitical concerns are becoming increasingly important drivers of regulatory policy.
Debate Intensifies Over Crypto Derivatives Risk
The legal and regulatory debate surrounding crypto derivatives intensified after the CEO of CME Group warned that newly approved perpetual futures products could create systemic risks. Supporters argue that bringing perpetual futures into regulated markets improves oversight and reduces reliance on offshore venues. Critics contend that integrating highly leveraged crypto products into the traditional financial system may create new risks. The regulatory conversation has evolved significantly. Policymakers are no longer asking whether crypto should be regulated—they are debating how much crypto-related risk regulated markets should absorb.
Staying informed and compliant in this evolving landscape is more critical than ever. Whether you are an investor, entrepreneur, or business involved in cryptocurrency, our team is here to help. We provide the legal counsel needed to navigate these exciting developments. If you believe we can assist, schedule a consultation here.
This Week in Crypto Law Archive:
This Week in Crypto Law (May 23, 2026)
This Week in Crypto Law (May 16, 2023)
This Week In Crypto Law (May 2, 2026)
